Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2011, 10:20 am
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: so it seems i am quoted in the sunday mail this morning ... [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:47 pm
I have informed Mrs. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:12 am
“If I change X percent, I won’t infringe. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:27 pm
It does what it says on the tin. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
Again, I have no great expertise here. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
I thought the Mayo v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:55 am
But I doubt that he really cared all that much about the priority of tax claims in Chapter X, or the fate of crooked securities entrepreneurs in Chicago [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:45 pm
That there are such surprises makes me, I admit, a bit nervous: If student X does a lot better than I would have predicted (based on conversations, participation, past performance, etc.), I worry that maybe, in other ways I didn't even notice or other contexts I didn't recognize, I might have somehow shortchanged X. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm
Section 4(b) of Article X specifically states that the exemption from forced sale inures to a decedent's surviving spouse. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:23 pm
Here is a sentence someone on proz.com wanted to translate into German: This paragraph does not limit any other remedies that X may have against Y as contained in this Agreement or in law or equity. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Does the FTC have to answer to a higher authority? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 am
So where does this leave us in terms of the ruling in the ECHR case and the next political battle over abortion? [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:30 pm
This post does not put forward any radical suggestions for change, but pleads, instead, for our future political representatives and legislators to consider two related basic points: 1. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
While I think some of what says makes some sense, I just can't go along to the extremes that she does. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:55 pm
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:37 pm
A loss run for the employer is like an x-ray or an MRI for the doctor. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:37 pm
Conclusion: In August 2010, I posted that "New Zealand allows patents on embedded software but fails to provide a definition". [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:51 pm
Invariably inventors will come and say they have invented X that does A, B and C. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:27 pm
It can and does contribute to market stability and fairness in the private sector as well. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:44 pm
If you believe the rumors, that is coming any day now, and when it does, I'm asking everyone else in St. [read post]
