Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 9,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm
The case of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:44 pm
Partially motivated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:26 pm
Ohio State Bar Ass’n, 436 U.S. 447, 449 (1978) (holding that state “may discipline a lawyer for soliciting clients in person, for pecuniary gain, under circumstances likely to pose dangers that the state has a right to prevent. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 8:50 am
As United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:31 pm
It looks like we might have a winner here: P published statements that were clearly intended to “impeach the . . . reputation” of V, so prosecution for criminal libel might be a possibility, depending on what state(s) all this happened in. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
In S.E.C. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm
The court relied on a recent decision from the Supreme Court of the United States, Kokesh v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Macomber that the 16th Amendment’s exemption from apportionment is limited to taxes on realized gains. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 5:23 am
In Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm
The defendant can emphasize that due process is a mirage if the foreign defendant must first accept the penalty of an indefinite stay in the United States to gain access to the court. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Initially, the NEB stated that they had met with former Quebec premier, Jean Charest, to seek his political advice. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (indirectly quoting R.A.V.); United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:42 pm
” The court, however, rapidly rejected this argument, noting that the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Therefore, Viatek has not stated a claim for unfair competition under the Lanham Act and this counterclaim is dismissed. * Sussman-Automatic Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
While the concept seems to be gaining ground in abstract opinion polls, to date, only 5-states allow same-sex marriages: Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont. [read post]
