Search for: "I. C. "
Results 5541 - 5560
of 55,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2017, 7:56 pm
John C. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
The rape of children by their parents in child porn production cases rolls off my back, and I readily accept Rule 11(C)(1)(c) plea agreements without blinking. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:46 pm
C. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Of course, the California opinion did not address Rule 502(c). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:56 pm
" In commenting on the Resolution, Assembly of First Nations National Chief Shawn Atleo is quoted as commenting that "I applaud the Chiefs who demonstrated that, despite unfounded and alarmist attacks by our critics, First Nations fully believe in accountability and transparency and are dealing with this issue head-on. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
I've added Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 8:25 pm
To keep things simple here, I'm going to focus on the sound recording exceptions. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 10:25 pm
While I’m sure these views were honestly held, I never saw facts or analysis to back them up. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 7:34 pm
That’s big and inconsistent with what I know. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
§ 152(c)(4). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:04 pm
On the whole, it's better than I expected. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:43 am
If I take a picture of a toy action figure am I in violation of copyright or do I own that picture to use as I want? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
by John C. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
What is, I argue, problematic, in particular in relation to paragraph 49 of the judgment, is the following. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:27 am
You can see the incongruity here for you to be a M/C for a company you’ve just completed training with. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:34 am
The worker, in turn, must sign Form C-3.1, which demonstrates that the worker knows that he has the right to select, but that the employer can be asked to assist. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:42 pm
Indeed, the fair dealing protection afforded by section 29 of the Copyright Act, RSC, 1985, c C-42, is so obviously applicable to the acknowledged facts of this case that the litigation should never have been commenced let alone carried to trial. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:07 am
As I shall explain, I do not believe that it is possible to offer such an account; and to illustrate the difficulties involved in trying to do so, I am going to consider the accounts of the normativity of law proposed by three prominent jurisprudents, who all work in the tradition of legal positivism, namely, Hans Kelsen, Gerald Postema, and Andrei Marmor. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:07 am
As I shall explain, I do not believe that it is possible to offer such an account; and to illustrate the difficulties involved in trying to do so, I am going to consider the accounts of the normativity of law proposed by three prominent jurisprudents, who all work in the tradition of legal positivism, namely, Hans Kelsen, Gerald Postema, and Andrei Marmor. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:42 pm
Indeed, the fair dealing protection afforded by section 29 of the Copyright Act, RSC, 1985, c C-42, is so obviously applicable to the acknowledged facts of this case that the litigation should never have been commenced let alone carried to trial. [read post]
