Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 15,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2019, 6:23 am
The long awaited ruling in Mission Products Holding, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:03 am
And the government has taken other steps to try to move people back to work, including a nine-month trial work period, in which recipients can continue to receive benefits while attempting to re-enter the workforce. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
There had been a significant movement to liberalize abortion laws before Roe, but that ruling took the number of states that legalized abortion from about one-third to 50 overnight. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:29 pm
The current general transparency rule in the Court of Protection is that the media, legal bloggers and the public may attend and report on hearings, but the identity of the people involved in the case must remain anonymous. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:24 am
Responsible for assessing client needs, planning care, coordinating and facilitating the plan, evaluating and re-evaluating the actions required to meet the client’s health and human services’ needs. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:12 am
James continued with the hope that Sandi would agree to a reconciliation. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:18 am
Justice Department continues to adhere to the directive set forth in The Cole Memo, which in 2013, after years of incessant raids on the legal marijuana dispensaries, collectives, doctors and patients, instructed federal prosecutors to eschew pursuit of marijuana organizations and businesses abiding state law where the drug is legal. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:00 am
The Military Times reports, “A bipartisan group of House lawmakers announced new legislation to do away with the legal rules protecting the Defense Department from medical malpractice lawsuits. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
The private post-purchase control that IoT companies exert over smart goods represents a significant change in private actors’ regulatory capacity to set rules governing knowledge. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm
” While that respect is appreciated, it does not carry the same legal weight as legislative protection. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:04 am
” In re High–Tech Employee Litig., 856 F. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:47 pm
“From this day forward, you are the voice and the instrument for the rule of law,” Hecht said. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:47 pm
“From this day forward, you are the voice and the instrument for the rule of law,” Hecht said. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:17 pm
Staff should not be persecuted, threatened and put under continuous pressure and/or treated under the “Challenging People” doctrine. 5.1.3. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:52 am
This accident may trigger you to ask, what can you do legally if you’re injured by an Uber driver or a Lyft driver? [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:00 am
Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2019 SKCA 40 [66] There is little legal merit in Saskatchewan’s specific concern about Parliament conditioning the application of a federal law on whether a province has chosen to exercise its own jurisdiction. [read post]
14 May 2019, 1:34 pm
Rules of Court, rule 8.272(c)(2); see Pacific Legal Foundation v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:44 am
In November 2018, the DOL (re)issued an opinion letter rejecting that interpretation. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
P. 7.2(b); In re Baylor Med. [read post]