Search for: "Insurance Provider 2" Results 5541 - 5560 of 25,928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2020, 8:55 pm by Joe Bamford (UK)
In PS20/20 the PRA provides feedback to responses to chapters 2 to 7 of Consultation Paper 3/20 ‘Occasional Consultation Paper’ (CP3/20). [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A 2020 securities suit filing total lower than the totals in the last three years would be welcomed by the D&O insurance industry; however, a relatively lower year-end total that would still be well above historical levels is unlikely to have a significant impact on how D&O insurers perceive the level of securities litigation risk. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:10 am by Arthur F. Coon
 The provision in section 21080.25 exempting mega-projects reviewed in a programmatic EIR may provide some protection from subsequent environmental review requirements. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:31 am by Bob Kraft
Many medical and lawyer referral services can also be called for help after an accident. 2. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In fact, Safeco Insurance Co. of America, a surety, made exactly the above argument in Yard Works LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:00 pm by Russell Knight
[T]he following…which is known as “non-marital property”: (1) property acquired by gift, legacy or descent or property acquired in exchange for such property; (2) property acquired in exchange for property acquired before the marriage; (3) property acquired by a spouse after a judgment of legal separation; (4) property excluded by valid agreement of the parties, including a premarital agreement or a postnuptial agreement; (5) any judgment or… [read post]
Under the proposed MCIT pathway, CMS would provide national coverage for breakthrough medical devices for on-label uses beginning on the date of FDA market authorization. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am by Eric Goldman
Also, I don’t understand the significance of #2–bidding more than the trademark owner is a problem how exactly? [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
Background The rule against reflective loss The rule that “reflective loss” cannot be recovered has its origins in Prudential Insurance Co Limited v Newman Industries Limited (No 2) [1982] Ch 204. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:55 pm by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
In addition, the FMLC notes that there are requirements in existing EU regimes such as those to disclose environmental or social objectives provided by Article 8 (3)(c)(ii) of the Regulation for packaged retail and insurance based investment products and under the principles to make “fair, clear and not misleading” disclosures under the UCITS Directive, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive There is… [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:27 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Solutions Law Press, Inc. provides human resources and employee benefit and other business risk management, legal compliance, management effectiveness and other coaching, tools and other resources, training and education on leadership, governance, human resources, employee benefits, data security and privacy, insurance, health care and other key compliance, risk management, internal controls and operational concerns. [read post]
AB 2399 would, in Sections 3302 and 3307 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, define “military member” for—and revise definitions of “care recipient,” “care provider,” and “family care leave” in—the family temporary disability insurance program (paid family leave). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 3:04 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Amy Chung
To bring Hong Kong in line with international standards, a new supervisory framework was introduced in July 2020, by way of the Insurance (Amendment) (No.2) Ordinance 2020[2], to empower the IA to directly regulate DIHCs and conduct more effective group-wide supervision. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:28 pm by Alex Oliveira
The social security system then provides disability insurance for disabled workers. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:19 pm by admin
The Act also prohibits taking the same actions against any workers who wear their own personal protective equipment (PPE), such as masks, faceguards, or gloves, at any worksite where the PPE (1) provides a higher level of protection than the PPE afforded by the employer or other entity covered by the Act, (2) is recommended by the applicable public health agencies, and (3) does not prevent the workers from performing their jobs or fulfilling their duties. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 8:11 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.: What happens when two North Korean businessmen violate international sanctions in the Democratic Republic of Congo? [read post]