Search for: "JONES v. STATE." Results 5541 - 5560 of 6,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  The most trenchant of them was offered by Judge David Sentelle in  United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The rationale for the “meet and confer” requirement was discussed in depth in the NPD of Jones (Robert) v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 712–13 (1997) (Breyer, J., dissenting))) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:32 pm by Lawfare Editors
The second point criticizes me for ignoring that IHRL includes state duties independent of individual rights. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm by Dan Bushell
For one, state supreme courts, led by the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Hayden v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 March 2020 (Julian Knowles  J) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various… [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:22 pm by Kevin Bankston
It is directly in line with Section 230's stated policy to "preserve the vibrant and competitive free market . . . for interactive computer services," including e-commerce, and sites like Amazon, craigslist, eBay, and their fledgling competitors should be celebrating the result.Up Next CDT is tracking another worrisome case, Jones v. [read post]