Search for: "Johnson v. Johnson" Results 5541 - 5560 of 11,080
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2014, 10:51 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In Johnson v Byron, Father successfully utilized the "she was giving-up the baby anyway" argument, a commonly un-persuasive assertion, but one that prevailed in both the Ottawa Family Court and the Michigan Court of Appeals, presumably due to the unusually dysfunctional parental dynamics [i.e. a concealed pregnancy, expedited adoption, heroin, marijuana, pills, booze, the works].The new law calls for the child to be returned to the Mother upon Father's filing of a… [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And after the Supreme Court granted cert in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
The F/V US Intrepid is a 186 foot catcher/processer vessel owned and operated by Fishermen's Finest Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:37 am by Jane Chong
This leaves open the possibility that in place of official selective disclosures, the government may simply rely more heavily on leaks (under Wilson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
North Carolina, 13-604 (granted at the April 18 Conference, relisted once); Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:06 am by Marisa N. Hourdajian
Intertate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991) and AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:11 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Until that day comes, the exclusionary rule should be limited to bad-faith violations.The high court also took up Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:58 am by Lyle Denniston
North Carolina), and the second focusing on whether possession of a shotgun should be treated as a violent felony for purposes of federal criminal sentencing (Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:47 am by Andrew Hamm
Kerry (13-628), and Johnson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
A recent Tax Court decision, Johnson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
Under a proposed settlement agreement submitted to the court on Friday, April 11, Metlife, Inc. would pay $1.97 million to resolve class allegations that it unlawfully failed to pay California financial services representatives (FSR) their commissions, debited their accounts for company operating expenses, and neglected to pay overtime, and/or reimburse them for business expenses (Johnson v Metlife, Inc, CDCal). [read post]