Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 5541 - 5560 of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm by Alexander J. Davie
 Below is a quick summary of the cases where this line of reasoning has been used and the results thus far: Teamsters Local 237 Additional Security Benefit Fund, derivatively on behalf of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
Similarly, some printers were granted privileges to entire categories of books, such as law books. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
Dannie is a Legal Researcher at the Law Reform Commission. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
In my experience of discussing the law of product-by-process claims with a large number of people, it is important to have in mind the right kind of claim. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:58 am by Jesse Mondry
(GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
   Specifically, the question is, what does the Court of Appeal do when the US Supremes tells it to re-analyze a $55 million punitive damages award, already reduced twice, in light of Philip-Morris USA v. [read post]