Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 5541 - 5560 of 5,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2007, 2:20 pm
  They could have referred the case to the California State Bar. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:00 pm
Association pour la Defense et la Promotion de l'oeuvre de Marc Chagall Dite Comite Marc Chagall v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
  Click to read the full court opinion State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:29 am
The New York Law Journal reports this morning (March 15) that NY State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried has ordered that some lawyers who were present at the "secret" settlement meeting on January 31 submit to depositions to settle a hotly disputed point: whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner who was present at the meeting, Gandolfo V. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
When reviewing 12(b)(6) motions, the Court accepts the facts as stated in the complaint as true and view them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 9:16 am
In this article, I explore the court's "state of mind" in the post-post-Enron era through the lens of a particular case, VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/21/07 referred to higher education LAW / CORRECTNSA5721 Reilly -- Provides for searches of records for sex offense convictions of volunteer firefighters and emergency medical technicians SUMM : Amd S837-o, Exec L; amd S10-1006, Vil L; amd S122-b, Gen Muni L Provides for searches of records for sex offense convictions of volunteer firefighters and emergency medical technicians. 02/21/07 referred to governmental operations LAW / CORRECTNSA5724 Tedisco… [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 7:14 am
Plaintiffs stated claim for relief that police who had been setting up sweeps of a bar to check customers for identification. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
§164.512(e)(iii)(C)(2).In light of the applicable HIPAA regulation, a claim that the Act preempts state civil practice makes no sense. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:46 am
Holding: After a careful examination of the evidence in the light most favorable to the State's position, the Court concluded the evidence was sufficient for the jury to conclude that Appellant was guilty of aggravated assault and battery. [read post]