Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 5541 - 5560 of 42,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
  The en banc Third Circuit Court struck down the law as written, thus barring its use in any case no matter what the specific facts. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 3:16 pm by Ilya Somin
The high court ruled, however, that it would be unconstitutional to seize property without clear, quantitative evidence of a property’s malign influence on surrounding areas. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 2:26 pm
Undoubtedly, there is sufficient information to remand the matter for a new hearing and petitioner is allowed to present evidence to show that the victim is not entitled to petitioner’s benefits because she is otherwise insured. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 6:47 am
State, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that[h]earsay, the Florida Evidence Code tells us, `is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm by Tom Casagrande
” Addressing the “civil action” alternative, the court held: (1) § 145 itself imposes no limit on an applicant’s right to introduce new evidence in the district court, regardless of whether he could have introduced before the BPAI; (2) such new evidence is subject only to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence; (3) the district court must make de novo findings on any issues implicated by the new… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Alain Leibman
Episodes which are “inextricably intertwined” with the charged activity are by definition not “other act” evidence whose admissibility is limited by the Rule. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
Let's also remember that, in addition to these charges, Scruggs faces potential charges in the DeLaughter matter. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:57 pm by Bexis
Post-Levine preemption motions remain a matter of utmost care and discretion, and require (as is the case in Fosamax) a powerful regulatory case.The preemption ruling in Fosamax was based on the following FDA-related facts relating to the alleged drug risk of atypical femur fracture ("AFF"):The use was on-label – the drug was approved for marketing for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in older women, and that’s what the plaintiff had it prescribed for. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The court stated that the evidence in the case failed to lay a foundation for the provision of that instruction to the jury. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:09 am by Gregory Dell
Hardt still prevailed "on the merits" because the district court found evidence that she was totally disabled and was "inclined" to rule in her favor. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:59 pm
Even if a patent determined valid by a court ruling can still be invalidated through reexamination at the PTO. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:59 am by Earl Drott
Evidence will be deemed relevant if it is likely to make the existence of a fact that is material to the determination of the case more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Today we're thinking about evidence - specifically FDA evidence. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 11:41 am by Howard Knopf
These matters will be addressed later, when the intentions of all participants are more fully ascertained. [read post]