Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 12:08 pm
I've heard that almost anyone can walk in and ask (demand?) [read post]
DISTRACTION: So, yesterday reader John Mark Williams suggested that the Colbert testimony was inten…
24 Sep 2010, 9:19 am
As ridiculous as Colbert makes Congress look, and perhaps Mr. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:09 am
I began touting Carl Schmitt's incisive (and altogether depressing) analysis of the Wemar Parliament several years ago; if anything, he's even more on the mark now than then. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
But this misses the mark on two counts. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
Will Congress have to act to remove the “for cause” provisions? [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:03 am
Congress is at it again - proposing laws regarding the Internet that sound well and good, but may have an adverse and broad impact. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:38 am
This year marks the 15th Anniversary for the Georgetown University Law Center’s class of 1995. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:40 am
"I think to go back and completely reopen it now with a whole other set of question marks and uncertainties about what people are supposed to be doing ... [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:18 am
He later told it that (Richard Stallman) We're here at the World Computer Congress and what I've discovered is that the European Patent Office is here to campaign in favour of software patents in Australia. [...] [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:08 pm
I read the CAFC's In re Bose decision to say, fraud means fraud, and I believe when forced to decide the question, it will come down favoring a literal reading of the plain meaning of fraud within the Lanham Act, leaving to Congress the decision of whether an amendment to the Act may be required to preserve the integrity of the U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
September 20, 2010, Volume 2, Number 27 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
” I had in fact not asked him, but I nodded my head in agreement, even though one imagines he and I likely disagree over exactly what internal threats the Constitution presently faces. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:52 am
The bill before Congress only deals with disclosure; although, awaiting hope to bar corporate participation in elections at all, I'll take more disclosure. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
The feedback that I've gotten has been overwhelming. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Why are we not going after the .XXX domain like congress tried to get passed? [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
MURTHA UPDATE: Not Even Death Can Stop Congress’s Pork King. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
Notably, original co-sponsors John Cornyn (R-TX), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Jim Risch (R-ID), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) did not sign the letter. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm
The rest I just squandered. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:26 am
Paul Ryan, the most intellectually ambitious Republican in Congress, lavishly cites Brooks’s book. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
What made the plant here vulnerable is, in part, a 2007 energy conservation measure passed by Congress that set standards essentially banning ordinary incandescents by 2014. [read post]
