Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5541 - 5560 of 21,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Noel Canning, and use the original meaning as a regulative ideal doctrinally, as in Free Enterprise v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:00 am by clc-admin
These consignments were re-sold by A to a third part C under separate contracts which mirrored (save for a mark- up) the contracts between A and B, including the incorporation of LCIA arbitration clauses. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
 Section 32(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 requires (at least for now) that a trade mark applicant must state its good faith intention to use the mark applied for. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:18 am by scanner1
Marks DA 17-0686 2019 MT 76N Criminal – Other McGree v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:43 am
Until February 2013, the eBay listings stated that the Daisy Charm links "fit[s] Nomination". [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
 Yet, a substantial number of people are staying past this three-day mark after being charged with nothing more serious than a Class B misdemeanor. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has affirmed, on summary judgment, the TTAB's precedential decision in RxD Media, LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Patrick McDonnell
This opinion marks another step on a long, legal journey that began when Bahlul was first charged in 2004. [read post]