Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 5541 - 5560 of 7,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters’ has threatened to sue Nick Smith for $30m if he refuses to apologise for comments he made in relation to the transparency of the New Zealand First Foundation. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  There is a report on the Journalism.co.uk website and a discussion by Peter Preston in the Observer, who makes an interesting point about the differences between the print and online editions point out that MailOnline is separate – deliberately “different”. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated (IPKat) England’s new shirt sponsors? [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Peter Sluka recently wrote about one example he litigated to conclusion of an injunction action successfully stopping a threatened cash-out merger before its consummation due to absence of any articulated, statutorily-required “business purpose. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 24 January 2011 permission to appeal was granted in the case of Gaunt v OFCOM. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
L’appelante soutient que ces événements n’étaient pas des empêchements et que le rapport n’aurait pas dû en faire état. [read post]