Search for: "Reiter v. Reiter" Results 5541 - 5560 of 6,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
CTV News reports  today that Stephen Harper's Conservative government continues to hedge on whether it will abide by an April 23, 2009 Federal Court ruling, require it to formally request the repatriation of Omar Khadr, a  Canadian citizen  confined at Guantanamo Bay since 2002:  Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said Sunday the federal government is still pondering whether to appeal a Federal Court order on the Omar Khadr case.On… [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 5:14 pm by Alex Ely
Limits on the Use of Signals Intelligence Collected in Bulk Regarding this central issue, which was developed in PPD-28, the report reiterates the directive’s requirement that the intelligence community may only use this information in six circumstances: to counter espionage and other threats and activities of foreign powers or intelligence services against the U.S. and its interests;  (ii) counterterrorism;  (iii) counter-proliferation;  (iv)… [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
” Arriving at the same conclusion on this issue as in Schumacher v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in American Legion/Maryland National-Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Globe24h.com, 2017 FC 114 and the Supreme Court of Canada in Google Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm by Amy Howe
The case, Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:00 am by Chris Whytock
Outside the post-FNC context, in Society of Lloyd’s v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:43 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
Cal. 2016) (declining to enforce California choice of law provision in user agreement and applying Illinois law and refusing to find that the text of BIPA excludes from its scope all information involving photographs); Patel v. [read post]