Search for: "Robert Thomas"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 10,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 11:23 am
The always-lovable Justice Scalia authored a separate opinion concurring in the judgment, joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas and Alito. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
But Chief Justice Roberts himself would presumably take a more literal view of his opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:43 am
“I’m sorry, not so fast,” Roberts says. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
Here was the majority’s view (in the opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts and joined by the four more liberal Justices) (boldface emphasis and some paragraph breaks added): It is of course true that “an exemption from an otherwise permissible regulation of speech may represent a governmental ‘attempt to give one side of a debatable public question an advantage in expressing its views to the people. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:56 am
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
Justice Thomas, joined by Justices Scalia and Alito, also submitted an opinion concurring in judgment, in which he stated that he would overrule Basic in favor of a straightforward rule that “reliance by the plaintiff upon the defendant’s deceptive acts—actual reliance, not the fictional ‘fraud-on-the-market’ version—is an essential element of the §10(b) private cause of action. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The Court's majority decision written by Chief Justice Roberts struck down the law on narrow free speech grounds. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
Yet, neither Justice Scalia (nor Justices Thomas or Ginsburg, who joined the opinion in Gant) wrote separately to endorse the Gant framework for cell phones. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
Chief Justice Roberts writes the main opinion, and there's a Scalia concurrence, joined by Kennedy and Thomas, and an Alito concurrence. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:10 am
Four of the justices — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito — would have gone farther. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
Circuit's opinion in Noel Canning (Breyer wrote the unanimous decision, with Scalia writing a concurrence, joined by Roberts, Thomas, and Alito). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm
Finally, the Court – speaking through Chief Justice Roberts – said what it could have said in the first go-round. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas, dissented. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
He was more likely to vote with Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy, Justice Thomas or Justice Alito than any of the other liberals. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 am
., for the broadcasters): Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan; and dissenting (i.e., for Aereo), were Scalia, Thomas, Alito. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:55 am
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts, in an opinion joined by five other Justices, took a more minimalist approach. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:53 am
You can find out more about the film on our colleagues' blogs, such as Robert Thomas' inversecondemnation.com and Ilya Somin's volokhconspiracy.com. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Contrary to what Justice Thomas argued, “fraud on the market” is not about the integrity of a price. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justices Scalia and Alito joined. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:07 pm
It is a 9-0 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, although Justice Thomas (joined by Justices Alito and Scalia) concurred only in the judgment. [read post]
