Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 5541 - 5560 of 11,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
(This is not the first time Trump has asserted executive privilege in relation to individuals outside of government, though it may be the first time he’s done so for a podcaster.) [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:52 am by Wage & Hour Blogger
  The ACA’sindividual mandate” requires that all individuals, as of January 1, 2014, have health insurance or face penalties (unless exempt due to low income or religious beliefs). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
 Holding The Second Circuit, in a decision authored by Judge Jacobs, vacated the district court's order, finding that "[w]e cannot say that the trial court properly applied Batson in this case. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
If the answer is "no," the rationale might be the same used by a court discussing the parent's duty: [W]e believe that to require a parent as a matter of law to take affirmative action to prevent harm to his or her child or be held criminally liable imposes a reasonable duty upon the parent. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
Naomi’s earlier post provides an excellent summary of the decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:50 am by Eugene Volokh
But Oberlin's Sexual Misconduct Policy explicitly notes that individual cases might require a longer time frame. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:27 am by Cyberleagle
…[W]e will continue to engage with users, industry and civil society as we continue to refine our policies ahead of publication of the full policy response. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:08 am by Rekha Arulanantham
Hina also appeared on MSNBC’s Up w/ Chris Hayes last week to discuss the targeted killing program. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 3:43 pm by Josh Blackman
Ct. 2566, 2593–2600 (2012) (characterizing the "penalty" imposed by the individual mandate as a "tax"). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Then there’s the case of West H. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:22 pm by LindaMBeale
  It just provides an upfront dollar for dollar reduction in taxes compared to the deduction's lesser benefit. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:51 am by Steven Boutwell
  In contrast, if that partnership was structured as an S corporation for tax purposes and its owners received a combination of W-2 wages (included in payroll costs) and dividends (likely excluded from payroll costs) it would be eligible for a higher loan amount since the wages would be considered payroll costs. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:54 pm by Lawrence Solum
The central point discussed in Section II is that Flaw’s arguments are in tension with social psychological findings suggesting inherent shortcomings in limiting decision-making review to a small group of individuals. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:17 am by PaulKostro
My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. [read post]