Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 23,609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Fund v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:43 am
Foster v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:31 am
Co. v North American Specialty Ins. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 12:08 pm
Collins v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 8:41 am
Back in November 2017, I wrote about O’Sullivan Films v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 11:07 am
Dachauer v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
This is a concrete rule that directly implicates our selling of our legal services. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 12:32 pm
While the registration statement did not say that Parent could, at will, simply abandon the Company, “the offering documents did say that neither party was required to buy or sell any project, or to do so on any particular terms. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 5:59 am
"As I mentioned in my report on Huawei's testimony on Day 2 of the FTC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 3:25 am
In particular, ESMA believes that there should be a means to ensure that the protocol and smart contracts underpinning crypto-assets and crypto-assets activities meet minimum reliability and safety requirements; some amendments to the pre- and post-trade transparency requirements applicable to venues trading crypto-assets are needed, as the current requirements are tailored to traditional financial instruments; and further analysis on the interaction between crypto-assets qualifying as financial… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
But what if she never sells? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:01 pm
When a witness testifies in FTC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
The Act's heavy reliance on Medicaid expansion also sought to save federal costs -- with disastrous results after NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:07 am
In the recent unpublished (non-precedential) decision of Mathurin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:34 am
They listed the property for sale at least 10 months after finishing the basement and had no thoughts of selling the property at the time that they made those improvements (see Gabberty v Pisarz, 10 Misc 3d 1010, 1020-1021 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2005]). [read post]
