Search for: "Session v. State"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
’ In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, supra. [read post]
Patent office and Qualcomm's litigation tactics render prof's fanboy testimony on patents unreliable
23 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
The combination of two Apple v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:18 pm
See also, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Mischon de Reya’s Data Matters blog has published a podcast, The News Sessions, with the first instalment focusing on key areas of GDPR compliance. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness:… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:27 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
On April 25, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on the lawfulness of President Trump’s latest “travel ban,” the only matter on the Court’s final scheduled oral argument session of the Term. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
., Barrett v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am
The IWL can help you. https://t.co/iT3uTLpwrw -> Possible to decide copyright infringement claims in arbitration, states High Court of Bombay https://t.co/jMZBfkBMzV -> TPP A healthy agreement – The Washington Post https://t.co/x1zHL5fSB9 -> Patent Protection for Scientific Discoveries: Sequenom, Mayo, and the Meaning of § 101 https://t.co/59YbFoMhWy -> Conference on the Global Digital Content Market Opens at WIPO https://t.co/oa4oBXFonZ -> Holmes v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
In the courts A.A. v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
That missionary role is especially evident in the context of European relations with states at the initial phases of development and with Marxist Leninist States. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am
The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under the New York Labor Law, which was unaffected by the FLSA exemption that sent the plaintiff’s federal claims into foul territory (Chen v Major League Baseball, March 26, 2014, Koeltl, J). [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm
” In particular, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) has stated that “this is an unfortunate and needlessly divisive nomination” as “Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
Phillips,Wyoming Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; JillE. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:51 pm
In 2017, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions sought to cut Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant funds to state and local governments that fail to meet three conditions: 1. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
William Downey, Managing Director at W J Downey & Associates and graduate (cum laude) from the Saint Georges School of Law (1996), said, In Antigua v United States, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said the United States could restrict online gambling on sporting events, but could not prohibit offshore companies from offering online betting on horse racing. [read post]
