Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm
Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
Here is the abstract: In Schenck v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:17 am
Biology, or Form v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:10 pm
That thought played central role in Jachetta v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:41 am
Jivraj v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
So it is with the arbitration contract, which the UK Supreme Court has discussed at length in its recent judgment in Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
Federalism’s epiphenomenal character here is revealed by the fact that such libertarian concerns would apply no less to state mandates of the kind enacted by Massachusetts than they would to any federal mandate. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
Thus, whether the market at issue is seen as just the insurance market or as the overall health care market – of which insurance is an integral part – its economic character is indisputable, as the Court held half a century ago with respect to the insurance industry in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
” (See MedImmune v Genentech, 549 U.S. 118, at 127 (Sup Ct, 2007)), the Court moved to consider the main issue at play in the case: patentable subject-matter. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:27 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Alpha Delta Chi-Delta Chapter v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:07 am
In Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:09 am
1800 Get Thin, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am
Reemployment of public retireesConnolly v McCall, CA2, 254 F.3d 36 Section 150 of the Civil Service Law and Section 211 of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL] set out the rules governing the reemployment for compensation of an individual receiving a retirement allowance from a New York public retirement system. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
” Bilski v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
From the Land of the Glens comes the judgment of the Glennie in the form of Schuh Limited v Shhh... [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Singga Enterprises (Canada) Inc.; Tory Burch LLC, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:59 pm
Assoc. for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
