Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 5,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Since 1994, VAWA has broken new ground in federal and state responses to domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am
Since 1994, VAWA has broken new ground in federal and state responses to domestic violence, sexual as [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:06 am
The complaint aptly states that the story of how the exhibition came to be is “a truth stranger than fiction. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Davis Law Review. 26 (1993) : 791-851. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
1981 – Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom In 1967, homosexuality was in part decriminalised in England and Wales.[2] In 1980, it would be decriminalised under the same conditions in Scotland, and in 1982, in Northern Ireland as well. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
In the case of Gram Panchayat & Anr. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 6:15 pm
The main purpose of the Protocol is to make an internationally unified treaty on security agreements and the attached protocol to reflect the unique characteristic of each space asset.[6] They would solve the problems because of the difference of security laws of each State. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm
John Maloof v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
In case you want to reach Nick Alden or Dennis Moore, the two lawyers in this case, here’s their contact information: Nick Alden, Attorney at Law 1380 Davies Dr. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:29 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:26 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
