Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 8,250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 5:26 pm
That case is California Common Cause v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
United States, 507 U.S. 234, 242 (1993)). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:21 am
In Boyle v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:51 am
Wilson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
[I]t is clear that the wording of Article 19(1) of the Regulation does not make any distinction on the basis of whether the third party is the holder of a registered Community design or not. 34 Thus, that provision states that a registered Community design is to confer on its holder the exclusive right to use it and to prevent ‘any third party’ not having his consent from using it. 35 Similarly, Article 10(1) of the Regulation provides that the scope of the… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
M & T Bank Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
" The Court of Chancery answers this question in the affirmative in Shiftan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:18 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
., offshore websites offering copyrighted music or movies for download, or selling counterfeit Omega watches, all without authorization from the rights holders. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:24 am
In Bender Square Partners v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:18 am
Congress explicitly stated that its objective in passing 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:03 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:40 am
Holder, decided nearly three years ago. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:35 am
" Brief for Respondent at 44, Nken v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
One of the privileges provided by trademark law is a trademark holder's right to prevent another's use of a mark that, while not confusingly similar in a direct way, nevertheless "dilutes" the trademark holder's registered trademark. [read post]
