Search for: "State v. Main" Results 5541 - 5560 of 11,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
But Member States do not enjoy them: the rationale of fundamental rights is to protect individuals from the State, not vice versa: "If the State were able to invoke its individual rights, other than the public interest, in order to limit fundamental rights, the result would be the destruction of those fundamental rights. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:00 am
(photo: V 2) Related posts:Be careful who your friends are At Sam Glover's behest, I have been experimenting with...Facebook 101: why lawyers should be on FacebookLawyers who are not on Facebook are missing out on...Two states opt for sane lawyer advertising rulesWithin recent days two states - Maine and Alabama- have... [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:54 am by Georgialee Lang
Judge Freda Wolfson presided over the State’s application, and refused to dismiss the fathers’ action, relying on a 2013 appellate decision, B.S. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 12:00 pm
These standards for new cars and trucks are to take effect in 2009. * * * Besides Massachusetts and California, the states challenging the Bush administration's policy are Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:50 am
The case was Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
The State of the Union message is a constitutional affair, in one sense. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]