Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 5541 - 5560 of 14,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Finally, Juror B's email states that the only other juror who began deliberations not already inclined to convict Roy was the juror who failed to show up on Monday and who was replaced by the alternate. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am by Florian Mueller
Today I've become aware of another ridiculously untrue assertion that is almost as bad as what happened in that Apple v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WIMS
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UTAG) v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
  In a statement, the Obama administration declared its strong support for the Senate passage of the DTSA stating that:"Effective protection of trade secrets promotes innovation that is the engine of the Nation’s economy and minimizes threats to American businesses, the U.S. economy, and national security interests. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
By a vote of 2 to 1, the Sixth Circuit refused this week, in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:59 am by karen
The Court also recognized that mere speculation by police on the harms that might result from releasing information can’t defeat the public’s strong interest in understanding how police surveillance impacts privacy. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 5:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, as I wrote here, there are strong stare decisis reasons not to overturn Abood. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
In Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, the court stated that in the absence of such a good cause showing, the court has no discretion to entertain even a meritorious, non-prejudicial cross motion for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:20 am by John Jascob
Shareholders alleged that Alphabet knew of a privacy vulnerability in the Google+ social network but concealed that fact, falsely stating in its next quarterly report that its risk factors had not changed. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am by John Jascob
Furthermore, while the trial court clearly erred in instructing the jury on state of mind, the error did not “seriously impair” the integrity of the proceedings (U.S. v. [read post]