Search for: "*in Re Jones"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 5,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2007, 11:18 am
What do you do if you’re an embattled big shot? [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
Without prior notice, Oregon District Judge Jones sentenced Leonard to twenty-four months - the stat max for the term of supervised release. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 5:35 am
So I'll tell you that we're experiencing a banana. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 2:50 am
" Freddy Jones and Sergio Rodriguez turned in B to B-minus performances; sparkling they weren't. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:32 pm
"We're a new nation, but we're aiming to stay," they seem to shout. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:14 am
We know, you're already fretting, "Whither Ralph Baxter, that fearless leader of Orrick? [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Here's another good story by another hard worker, Lavonne Kuykendall of Dow Jones Newswires. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:42 am
The wonderful characteristic is the extremely broad array of firms represented, from very large (Jones Day, Greenberg Traurig, Orrick) to regional (Stites & Harbison). [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 11:51 pm
Rhonda will present the various ways Factiva and Dow Jones Product & Services. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 5:48 am
"It's a roll of the dice," said Nathaniel Jones, a retired 6th Circuit judgeappointed by President Carter. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 11:11 am
If you’re aware of any other Seattle-based law blogs, please let me know! [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 2:49 am
In re Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., No. 2006-1309, U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:17 pm
Jones, I'm certain I didn't understand you correctly. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:42 am
Bonzi, so glad you're gonzi. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 5:39 am
Then I did some contract work and associated with a sole practitioner before I joined Jones Day in 1999, early enough to benefit from the salary hike that hit the fall. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
Jones, 520 U. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:38 am
And, further, serves greatly to help preventAn outcry that holds something must be doneAbout judges whose thinking stops at 1891Or, if we're lucky, to a time as near as 1931.It also makes life easier for the mediaWhich need not carry in its head an encyclopediaOr even turn to a legal wikipediaTo learn context and background of a judge's other decisions,Facts that would tell the public -- which would develop derision -- That a judge almost always sends one to the chair, or for… [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 3:16 pm
Jones Investment Co., 75 USPQ2d 1313 (TTAB 2005) [TTABlogged here], the Board found that addition of the house mark NORTON MCNAUGHTON to the "highly suggestive" registered mark ESSENTIALS for clothing was sufficient to avoid confusion. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:29 am
"It seems they're becoming more restrictive in interpreting the rights of the patentee," said Wetherell. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:47 am
Jones. [read post]
