Search for: "Case Under Seal" Results 5561 - 5580 of 6,729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
The lawsuit is under 42 USC Section 1983, that old standby of Reconstruction that allows one to sue in federal courts those who deny federal civil rights under color of state law. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 2:49 am by Seán Binder
 The proceeding will take place under seal at a different time. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Major ACTA leak: Internet and civil enforcement chapters with country positions (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (The Gray Blog) District Court N D California: Dancing tot prevails over UMG in YouTube fair use case: Lenz Blog v Universal Music Group (Ars Technica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (IP Directions)   Global Global - General… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Major ACTA leak: Internet and civil enforcement chapters with country positions (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (The Gray Blog) District Court N D California: Dancing tot prevails over UMG in YouTube fair use case: Lenz Blog v Universal Music Group (Ars Technica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (IP Directions)   Global Global - General… [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
Numerous cases have found that a delay under a year is sufficient to warrant dismissal for lack of due diligence. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 12:26 pm by Adam B. Edgecombe, Esq.
  Additionally, the parties can agree to keep all aspects of the arbitration confidential, whereas sealing a court record in state or federal court is difficult and rarely-granted. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 5:55 am
  It now appears that while the government has evidence to show that Ochoa's "millions" (ah, to be Roy Black) was, in fact, laundered drug proceeds, there is no evidence to show that Ben Kuehne knew that to be the case and thus, by giving his seal of approval to Black, intended to launder the funds himself. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 7:30 am by Kenan Farrell
A motion to maintain a document under seal is now fully-briefed as of September 12, 2023. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:27 am by SHG
How will the defendant do under pressure? [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:25 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Once it was installed in the homes, it was not all that dangerous as it was covered with a thick layer of paint and the fibers were sealed in place. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:10 am by Lorraine Fleck
Digital Music News In Los Angeles Court Today http://zite.to/JBoLdP The Beastie Boys Lawsuit: An Existential Question About Intellectual Property http://zite.to/KZBB3d Ailing Nokia falls back on patents legacy http://zite.to/K9vUOQ The IP Wars as “Competition” http://zite.to/KZBchc UPDATE: US Appeals Court Issues Mixed Ruling In Apple-Samsung Patent Case http://zite.to/KZBc0L Nvidia, Intellectual Ventures Buy Wireless Tech Patents http://zite.to/KZB7Kn Intellectual Property… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
   The appellate court  remanded the case for a new sentencing hearing, but the State appealed, arguing that the proper remedy was simply a hearing under 2929.191 and limited to the imposition of post-release controls. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
So holds the Tenth Circuit in a decision denying leave to proceed as a Jane Doe, but allowing for some information to be filed under seal. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:55 am by Jon Hyman
You May Be Breaking the Law – from the Evil HR Lady, writing at BNET The Cases Companies Are Watching: The Cat’s Paw Cases – from Employment & the Law Harassment in the hot tub: even bizarre cases require a measured response – from Donna Seale’s Human Rights in the Workplace Supreme Court Upholds “Relative” Retaliation Claim; Avoids Setting “Bright Line” Rule — Part… [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Instead, the judge gave the ex-partners until July 9 to submit under seal evidence demonstrating that they do not have the financial means to fund a defense. [read post]