Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5561 - 5580 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 1:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
Of the roughly 36 new securities lawsuits filed since June 30, 2013, seven have involved non-U.S. companies, or about 20% --roughly on par with the percentage of 2012 filings that involved non-U.S. companies. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 12:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Kings Criminal Lawyer said that, the defendant, charged with Attempted Assault in the Third Degree (PL §110/120.00[1]), moves to dismiss the superseding information pursuant to CPL 170.35(1)(a) for facial insufficiency. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00262-RLM-RBCFile Date: Friday, September 06, 2013Plaintiff: 80/20 IncPlaintiff Counsel: D Randall Brown of Barnes & Thornburg LLPDefendant: John DoeCause: Trademark Infringement, Passing OffCourt: Northern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Robert L. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:25 am by Ken White
Based on nearly 20 years experience in the criminal justice system, I believe my government and the people working for it are likely to (1) use national security apparatus to gather intelligence on defendants accused of domestic crimes, (2) pass that intelligence along to domestic prosecutors, and (3) lie about and conceal the source of the information or how it was transmitted. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm by Bexis
June 1, 2012); In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation, 817 F. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
The application was published on June 17, 1998; the notice of grant of the Patent-in-Suit was published on February 20, 2002. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
”9 Thus, we can break theft of movable property under the Model Penal Code into three elements: (1) unlawful taking or control, (2) of movable property of another, and (3) with intent to deprive. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
In an August 20, 2013 post in her On the Case blog (here), Alison Frankel examines the possible impact that the admissions could have on the fund investors’ pending civil action. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 9:49 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Defendant, adopting a broad-brush approach, offers 80% of the routine communications claimed (ie 20 routine communications). [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 2:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
With respect to the sentence imposed for grand larceny in the second degree, it was excessive as a matter of law (Penal Law, §§ 1297, 1941 subd. 1) because the record does not show that the former section 1944 of the Penal Law (now Penal Law, § 1905) was considered by the court in sentencing the defendant. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:50 am by Woodrow Pollack
Apr. 20, 2009) (finding that defendant purposefully availed itself of the forum when defendant copied and placed plaintiff’s copyrighted marketing materials on defendant’s website). [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:09 am by Spencer Aronfeld
Legal duty is a question of law that focuses on whether a defendant’s conduct foreseeable creates a broader “zone of risk” that poses a general threat of harm to others–or in other words does checking or not checking the driver’s license mean that a person is more or less likely to cause a car accident? [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Actually, Google's primary concern would be the embarrassment resulting from this (and which would even result from a $1 nominal damages award). [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
This comment made almost 20 years ago, it seems to me, goes to the heart of the permissive vs. mandatory issue that will be arg [read post]