Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 5561 - 5580 of 28,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 3:56 pm by Jessica Bayles
The Final Rule permits, but does not require, transmission providers to adopt a state agreement process. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm by Sarah Aberg and Pouneh Almasi
”[6] The Exchange Act provides a two-step test to assess whether a trading system meets the definition of an exchange: does the system bring together the orders for securities of multiple buyers and sellers; and does the system use established, non-discretionary methods (whether by providing a trading facility or by setting rules) under which such orders interact with each other, and the buyers and sellers entering such orders agree to the terms of the trade.[7]… [read post]
22 May 2009, 12:00 pm
The filing does not ask the Supreme Court to rule directly at this point on Davis’ claim of innocence. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:08 am by Kevin
[Update: it was missing bacon, which, to be honest, does seem a lot worse.] [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:55 am by Victor Medina
This kind of review is usually pretty easy for me to do because most estate plans are 1 of 3 kinds of forms that I have seen time and time again. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
Collective bargaining agreements must set out in clear and unmistakable language any waiving of an employee's right to a judicial forumAmbrosino v Village of Bronxville, 2009 NY Slip Op 00318, decided on January 20, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentJoseph Ambrosino sued the Village of Bronxville for damages based on alleged unlawful discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and for "breach of contract. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:21 pm by FHH Law
Sept. 20, 2013) are revised as follows: Comments due by October 25, 2013; replies due by November 1, 2013. 2. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  In some instances a claim reviewer does a physical file review in person. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board found claim 1 to be novel. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:12 am by Mark Zamora
 In the absence of a history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that aegeline, when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the labeling of your products, will reasonably be expected to be safe, Oxy Elite Pro and VERSA-1 are adulterated under 21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(B) and 350b(a) because they contain a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a… [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 2:55 am
The Board drew a distinction between 7(1)(c) and 7(1)(d). [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this examination appeal case Board 3.3.04 had to deal with a request for correction.Claim 1 of the application as filed read:1. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:16 am by Greg Reed
It does not address veteran’s disability benefits or federal employee disability benefits. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am by P.J. Blount
Furthermore, Justice Alito seems to believe that short term monitoring by GPS may be appropriate, yet does not point out what is considered “to long” of a period of monitoring. _____________________________________________ 1 U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The mere fact that an individual has been deported, even if he has been deported to a country with which Canada does not have an extradition treaty, does not render a case moot. [read post]