Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 6,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
In any event, for the first time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing a slowdown in terms of overall layoff numbers:1,125 (May 2009)1,500 (April 2009)3,500 (March 2009)2,000 (February 2009)1,500 (January 2009)Does this mean that the worst of the layoffs are behind us? [read post]
24 May 2009, 2:06 pm
What counsel does virtue ethics offer those who lack the full complement of human excellence? [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:36 am
It does not have a cap and trade program. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
The inclusion of paragraph 4 in part 1 to the schedule to the 2000 Regulations, whatever its purpose, does not, in my view, carry for paragraph 4 persons the implication of entitlement to a right to reside. 33. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:00 am
Aerotel does not itself make or sell anything. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
[para 33] Appeal allowed. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
Issues Addressed 1) Spoliation of Evidence and Duty to Preserve Evidence. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
Issues Addressed 1) Spoliation of Evidence and Duty to Preserve Evidence. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:14 am
The article does not explain at whose lap the jury placed the other 49% of the fault. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:13 am
Covered employers include those who (1) employ 100 or more employees, excluding part time employees; or (2) employ 100 or more employees (including part time employees) who aggregate at least 4,000 hours per week. [read post]
17 May 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is my ten cents: 1. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:56 pm
In my view, the position taken by the defence with regard to this issue has been unrealistic, and their suggested figure of $10,000 under this category of damages does not meet the test of fairness and reasonableness. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
” §2(a)(1), 105 Stat. 635, note following 13 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:00 am
§§ 968.27-.33 (2007-08). [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:05 pm
Ed. 2d 33 (1988). [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:59 pm
Id. at *33-36. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:44 am
The inspectors complained that their employment was terminated in retaliation for reporting to their supervisors about the compliance of the county with the Clean Water Act, in violation of rights secured by the whistleblower provision of the Act, 33 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:20 am
1. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
"(1) The Section 2 Report reflects a significant effort by my predecessors and the FTC in collecting and evaluating the opinions and expertise of antitrust enforcement officials from the United States and abroad, leading economists and legal scholars, antitrust practitioners, and representatives of the business community. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:21 am
The new clause states that: (1) A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if (a) A treats B in a particular way, (b) because of B’s disability, the treatment amounts to a detriment, and (c) A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability. (3) It… [read post]
