Search for: "Does 1-30"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 27,666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Only when there are 30 ratifications and an Assembly of States Parties vote of 2/3 or consensus – and, by terms of the amendment, no earlier than 2017 – will ICC jurisdiction over the crime of aggression commence.Beth’s questions are then implicated, namely: whether after 30 ratifications and the activation vote:(1) Will all states parties be subject to the exercise of ICC jurisdiction over the crime of aggression regarding their nationals and crimes… [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:47 am
” § 718.116(1)(a). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 11:51 am
We are relying on the “reasonable person” standard to overcome the 30 day notice requirement of 440.185(1). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:35 pm
vii) What does the prosecution need to establish under Article 30 of the Statute, bearing in mind Article 8(2)(b)(xxvi)(3) and Article 8(2)(e)(vii)(3) of the Elements of Crimes? [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:22 am
The trial judge does have broad discretion. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 6:17 am
Ultimately, the Court considered that: “Article 5(1) of the [Brussels I bis Regulation], read in conjunction with recital 3 of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that it applies for the purposes of determining the international jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State to hear and rule on a dispute between an employee from a Member State who does not carry out duties involving the exercise of public powers and a consular authority of that Member State situated… [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm
González, however, does not see a Congressional pathway available to accomplish that. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
App. 695, 702 (1) (556 SE2d 50) (2001). [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:36 am
The reminder does not address in any detail the content of the form. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:42 am
The North Carolina appeals court will look for errors of law or procedure[1]; it does not rehear evidence or question whether it would agree with the lower court’s decision. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:08 pm
However, that does not mean that individual directors are forbidden from endorsing candidates. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:28 am
P. 16(b)(1)(C). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Sept. 30, 2008). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
Download a copy of the agenda here (pdf) [1] Cuomo 2010, Cleaner Greener NY, at 1 (2010). [2] Id. at 7. [3] Id. at 91-92. [4] Id. at 94. [5] Id. at 96. [6] Id. at 95. [7] Id. at 97-98. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:49 am
An alternative would be September 30, Orange Shirt Day. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 pm
Our firm has analyzed the statutory changes and summarized the most significant updates below. 1. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Note that the Act’s disclosure requirement does not take effect until January 1, 2012. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:47 am
Code Ann 15-73-30 ("Comments to § 402A of the Restatement of Torts, Second, are incorporated herein by reference thereto as the legislative intent of this chapter. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
But the analysis does not end there. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:40 am
The courtclarified that the PMWA does not support the fluctuating work week method because it allows an employer to calculate overtime pay only at one half of the employee’s regular rate. [read post]
