Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 27,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 6:15 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18748 - State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:59 pm
A costs endorsement in the case of Persampieri v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:40 am
Wang v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:18 am
In Bailey et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
[Seminole Tribe v Florida, 116 S. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:58 pm
Went to Cal State Northridge and then Loyola Law School. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:20 pm
Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case from Chicago where the district court and Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that an oral complaint under the Fair Labor Standards Act is not sufficient to state a claim for FLSA retaliation. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 11:24 am
Programming Found., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 11:24 am
Programming Found., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:53 pm
Senate, Obama joined a bipartisan group of Senators to introduce the Fair Pay Restoration Act, a bill to overturn the Supreme Court's recent 5-4 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:34 am
Her arguments seem fairly weak, and especially in places, a fair piece of a results-oriented stretch to find as many procedural obstacles to relief as possible.Admittedly, Judge Ikuta does a decent job at the end of her dissent of making her position seem somewhat moderate, stating that "[a]ll this is not to say that the majority's view is unreasonable. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:50 am
The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal, stating that the underlying principle behind s 28 was one of fairness, enabling the court to correct imbalances. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
Giving the lead majority judgment Lord Hughes stated that questioning and search under compulsion undoubtedly constitutes an interference with art 8(1). [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 10:51 am
See AFPU v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:21 am
In Rivas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 12:48 pm
In Yu v. [read post]
