Search for: "GEORGE v. STATE" Results 5561 - 5580 of 7,221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by Steve McConnell
For every amazing underdog success story, such as Butler, George Mason, and VCU, there are way more Kentuckys, North Carolinas, and Michigan States. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:39 am by Legal Beagle
Mr Samond went on, unable to resist adding to his lengthy statement : “I remain grateful to Dame Elish and to the Rt Hon Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC - as well as their predecessors, Lord Steel and the Rt Hon George Reid - for their diligence and thoroughness in carrying out reviews such as this. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by NCC Staff
Secretary of State 2001 Kofi Annan, former United Nations Secretary-General* 2000 James Watson and Francis Crick, Co-Discoverers of the Structure of DNA 1999 Kim Dae-jung, former President of South Korea* 1998 George J. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am by David Lat
Blackmun and Antonin Scalia did in their dueling separate opinions in a 1992 abortion case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
More recently, the Supreme Court decided the case of Presley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]