Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 5561 - 5580 of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm by Greg Robinson
It also made it a state crime for immigrants not to carry documents, thus placing on them the burden of proof that they were present legally in the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 8:02 pm by JP Sarmiento
The BIA in C-V-T stated that the factors that the immigration judge must consider when deciding whether to grant cancellation of removal to a lawful permanent resident are as follows: The positive factors are: Family ties in the United States, particularly ties to lawful permanent residents or U.S. citizens; Residence of long duration in the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
In particular, this part highlights the spoken and unspoken premises that influenced the result in Bustamonte and outlines Bustamonte's continuing relevance for consent search cases today.Part III examines United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:16 am by SHG
At The Watch, Radley Balko dissects the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
United States (seven). [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:25 am by Robert S. Gilmore
On Tuesday, Nov. 30, 2021, United States District Judge Gregory F. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm by chucknewton
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:37 pm
I of the 1983 Constitution of Georgia and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
Amendments to title 18, United States Code, relating to sex offender registration.Sec. 142. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Susan Brenner
Litzinger then called the First Assistant United States Attorney for North Dakota, who said that the VHS tapes were within the scope of the warrant. [read post]