Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 6,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
The trial court granted the defendant's request and, on appeal, the Superior Court affirmed.In so ruling, the Superior Court weighed two conflicting public policies against each other. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
Even granting full faith and credit to the Superior Court's decision to delete Los Altos's England reservation from its complaint, the Superior Court's action cannot have had any "preclusive" effect on the claims Los Altos can assert before a federal court, because an explicit, on the record reservation is not required to preserve federal claims. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:56 pm
On 10 September 2008, our superior court granted appellant's petition for grant of review on the following issue: WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHERE THE TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL ALLEGEDLY PROVIDED INCOMPETENT ADVICE REGARDING THE LACK OF THE DEFENSE OF MENTAL RESPONSIBILITY. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
Many thanks to the blog reader who pointed out that on September 9, 2009, the Supreme Court granted review in Clark v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:40 pm
Superior Court of San Bernardino (Garlow) (2009) ___ Cal. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 6:04 am
She did, however, grant Plaintiffs leave to amend most of their claims. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Superior Court [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:45 am
An insurer represented by Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge attorneys John Hughes and Julia Ulrich was recently granted summary judgment by the Connecticut Superior Court in a lawsuit involving a claim for uninsured motorist coverage, and also alleging common law and statutory bad faith against the insurer. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:54 pm
On remand, the district court dismissed the complaint and granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment because the taking was for a valid public purpose. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 3:32 am
App. 4th 519, 531 (2008), rev. granted by Deleon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:21 pm
If you are making, restructuring or collecting asset-based loans, give us a call. ________________________________________ LANDLORD'S WAIVER: "A MUST DOCUMENT" By Barry V. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:49 am
Superior Court, currently pending before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:20 pm
In the case of Zappala v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:02 pm
Superior Court. (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 275, 278; Morgan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:10 pm
Personally, I don't think that "[o]ne of the principle issues in the case is whether father should be granted joint custody over the couple's 4-year-old son, Jacob. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
R (Gebremarium) v City of Westminster [2009] EWHC 2254 (Admin) Thanks to the Garden Court housing bulletin for pointing to this one. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:38 am
” In Standard Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
In Baker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Zobrist v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:20 pm
Superior Court (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 1403. [read post]
