Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 5561 - 5580
of 18,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
Suggesting that it “would be an understatement in the extreme to call the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
Review Denied (with dissenting justices) None. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
The bank’s request for re-hearing by the entire circuit was denied in May, and the bank has now asked the Supreme Court to take the case. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
Lord Neuberger states that (at the direction of the Court) the Registrar has asked all the parties to the proceedings whether they wish any of the Justices to stand down; all of the parties without exception have confirmed they have no objection to any of the Justices sitting on the a [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
(She does seem to think that Brown v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Golinksi v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:51 pm
Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
The speedy trial case, Bloate v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
White and Oncale v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
Some conservatives say foreign practices are irrelevant to U.S. law.Undaunted, Justice Kennedy used his opinion in Monday's case, Graham v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am
On the other, few defendants are well-positioned to go to trial even if they’re completely innocent. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 5:33 am
Reeves and Isabel V. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
Illinois, 10-8505, which concerns the issue left open in Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in last term’s Bullcoming v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:57 am
They should be able to ask "do you believe Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:01 pm
She refused to re-sign it. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ June 16 Conference. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
Di Re, 332 U. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
Richard Re had this blog’s preview. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Palmer v. [read post]
