Search for: "In re A. V." Results 5561 - 5580 of 62,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm by WIMS
      In the appeal from the district court's dismissal order, the Appeals Court said, "we conclude that, under Bennett v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:43 pm
U.S. (08-67), on the bar to re-trial after partial acquittal On Tuesday, the Court may issue one or more opinions in pending cases. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:24 am by Eric Goldman
Craftily Teacher’s Semi-Racy Facebook Photo Doesn’t Justify Firing – In re Laraine Cook Do Employers Really Tread a Minefield When Firing Employees for Facebook Gaffes? [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
But if you want more detailed knowledge -- including learning that that flight attendant who's saying "Welcome aboard" while you're boarding the plane is only making $1.60/hour while s/he's doing it -- then read this opinion.For what it's worth, I think that Justice Yegan is right that the wage class action here is preempted by federal law. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:18 am by Kali Borkoski
Pulling the thread on that narrative, Brandwein turned to an “unrecognized milestone”: Justice Bradley’s 1874 opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, the case re-affirms the Court’s nuanced, contextual approach to determining whether a Claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of the information at issue. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:27 pm by Matt Brown
In case you’re wondering, those rubber bands came off of a bouquet of grocery store broccoli crowns and actually hold the phone together quite nicely. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 8:52 am
  Its nice to see that the "you're not in custody and you're free to leave" line doesn't always work with the court. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
OK, one the one hand, the NL team are fighting over who gets to write up the detailed post, and on the other, we're struggling with who has time to do it soonest. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 3:00 pm
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court granted review in Meyer v. [read post]