Search for: "Johns v State" Results 5561 - 5580 of 22,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal… [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, John Bessler argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s majority opinion in Bucklew v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign volunteers and employees, including campaign chairman John Podesta. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Cyberleagle
” [1.23] If a Secretary of State decides that he wants to silence anti-vaxxers, the right way to go about it is to present a Bill to Parliament, have it debated and, if Parliament agrees, pass it into law. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]