Search for: "Kat"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 6,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
CJEU rules that ice cream sold as ‘Champagner Sorbet’ can be branded as ‘Champagne’Katfriend Nedim Malovic (Sandart & Partners) reports on a judgement released earlier this week (Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co.OHG, C-393/16) where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) reviewed relevant EU legislation on protected designations of origin (PDOs), following an injunction… [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 11:48 pm
This Kat wonders, how deep is the SPC mist? [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
These Kats don't give up without a fightThe Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has received over a dozen amicus briefs in support of Google against Oracle in a long-lasting battle for Java API (software interface) usage. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 12:44 pm
You Can't Joke About That by Kat Timpf (2023)22. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
Katnote: This Kat can't understand whether the legislation in question is a Bill or an Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Kat Eleonora Rosati summarizes the key points and most notable elements of the text: Coreper agrees common position on text of draft DSM Directive. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
Upset by Zhu’s fate, this English-speaking Kat and his guesting Dutch-speaking Katfriend are minded to stop there. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:26 am
This Kat is a bit puzzled too. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:06 am
This Kat is, however, still a little unsure how the trade mark owner is meant to take the initiative and influence the distributors/bakers/licensees. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:16 am
As another week rolls around, here are some interesting events, writing competitions and IP news to keep you going.December = unapologetically Christmassy Kat picturesEventsIP Inclusive EventsIP Inclusive have several events coming up open to all IP professionals which are free of charge.Tuesday 3 December 2019, 6-7pm: an informal launch meeting and discussion by their new disability support group IP Ability, to be hosted by AA Thornton at their offices at: 10 Old… [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:41 am
Kat friend Aaron Thng discusses a recent decision in Singapore that reminds us how expansive the claim can be in the context of a successful opposition. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
This Kat very much recognises the problem of lookalikes, and thinks that some culprits have been getting away with brand-murder for years. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Only one person really understands it, and that's fellow Kat Neil -- and even he isn't so sure about what it actually means]. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:31 am
* Surprise agreement on trade secrets – but still surprisingly secretiveAnother IP-Christmas present from Brussels is the “provisional agreement” on the proposed EU Trade Secrets Directive, which Kat friend Mark Ridgway (Allen & Overy) comments for us. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 1:53 am
In 2018, this Kat celebrated the passing of the Bill for an Act to repeal the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2004 (CAMA 2004) in a post, which addressed some aspects of the Bill that particularly affect IP and creative entrepreneurship. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:04 am
To this Kat, the Board of Appeal in this case were surprisingly lenient with regards to the quality of the data needed to support a medical use claim. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
“Be the Kat who got the cream”, he heartily wished, “do not let your contract becomes a dog’s dinner instead”. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 2:07 pm
While the categories and the list of finalists have not been released, the Spotify Awards playlist, including some of this Kat favourite singers, is already available here. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:18 am
This is because PDOs and PGIs are two different rights that accord two different types of protection [this Kat notes: there are numerous studies showing a low consumer awareness of what PDOs and PGIs are, let alone the difference between them. [read post]
21 May 2021, 11:00 am
Indeed, it had originally appeared in a public place, where it was free to be photographed by the public, and subsequently made available in digital form by Banksy himself for public personal use – meaning that the mark could not fulfil the basic function of a trade mark of denoting goods’ shared source [Merpel purrs in approval at a 2011 Kat post being exhibited at ARW7].As a result, Full Colour Black claimed that there were two possible bad faith goals at play: one, to… [read post]
