Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 13,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
Sound recordings weren’t brought under the protection of federal copyright law until 1972 so are protected by state laws and some services, notably SiriusXM, haven’t been paying performance royalties to artists to play these older works prompting claims from both artists (with Flo & Eddie from the Turtles leading the charge), record labels and collection society SoundExchange. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:34 am
There was once a dustup over the “Blue Ribbon” device in the 1932 case of Richard Hellman, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
In Forcellati v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
The case is a tricky one, exploring second medical use claims, skinny labels, and public policy issues around healthcare. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm
Treasury Department, approved “Palcohol” and then rescinded its approval over labeling issues. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
This lawsuit against DSS comes two months to the day after our state Supreme Court, in the case of Abbeville County School District v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:58 pm
Russia is a good label for decades of Russian history, though in that sense it was also Dzhugashvili v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm
” Tone Bros. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
In Nemphos v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:01 am
., v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
However, a district court’s judgment dismissing his claims of fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), and personal injury were affirmed on appeal (Weidman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Hood v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:00 pm
A Reuters story labels Reed v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 5:41 pm
Guntlow v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Swims Against The Tide Of Software Patent Ineligibility In Caltech v Hughes http://t.co/7kdz5dlVFU -> Appeals to watch in 2015: the appeals monitor’s top ten http://t.co/ufW4iFwYE2 -> Are you ready for CASL 2.0? [read post]
