Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2022, 1:46 pm
’” The strongest evidence of the individual defendant’s involvement was that he reviewed a draft of the website copy before publication and didn’t object. [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:57 am
In this case, the panel said, it was clear that the defendants became irrevocably liable to deliver shares in Boston, Massachusetts (SEC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
Eventually, the plaintiff's condition worsened to the point that he could no longer perform his job. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:37 pm
Both of their offers were conditioned on passing a pre-employment medical screening that would be conducted by defendant U.S. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:16 am
" The Defendants argued that the government’s duty of care ends "the instant the inmate walks through the prison gates and into the civilian world, because that is when the inmate’s ability to secure medication or care on his own behalf is restored" to him or her. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:16 am
" The Defendants argued that the government’s duty of care ends "the instant the inmate walks through the prison gates and into the civilian world, because that is when the inmate’s ability to secure medication or care on his own behalf is restored" to him or her. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:16 am
" The Defendants argued that the government’s duty of care ends "the instant the inmate walks through the prison gates and into the civilian world, because that is when the inmate’s ability to secure medication or care on his own behalf is restored" to him or her. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 7:35 am
If the presumption of equal shares is not overcome, one owner will be liable to the other owner when they withdraw more than their proportional share. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:14 am
"To recover damages in a negligence claim, it's not only necessary for the claimant to prove that the defendant (in this case, the surveyor) fell below the required standard of care and was negligent, but the claimant must also show that there was a relationship between the claimant and the defendant that created a "duty of care". [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:48 am
They claimed that the two companies were liable for several acts of negligence. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
Supreme Court strikes down, or severely limits, the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), what are the implications for plaintiffs and defendants in cases involving violations of international human rights law? [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 1:49 pm
Defendants filed a counter-complaint, and the trial court ultimately dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims and found that plaintiffs were liable to defendants for nuisance, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 6:07 am
Defendant sought judgment as a matter of law, but this motion was denied, at which point defendant appealed, arguing there was not a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the plaintiff. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:21 am
As such, the defendant’s motion was denied. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:27 am
Meyer's lawsuit against the defendants is a wrongful death action. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm
Almost two months after a jury verdict finding a public entity liable for decedent’s wrongful death, counsel for both sides finally agreed at a post-trial mediation, tentatively, to settle the matter; but they faced a unique dilemma. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm
And even when the plans themselves were named as defendants, the insurers would often defend the litigation. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:48 am
And even when the plans themselves were named as defendants, the insurers would often defend the litigation. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:55 am
Thus, the appellate court reversed the trial court’s order granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:21 pm
The complaint must allege facts that (1) defendant's conduct caused a foreseeable risk of harm, (2) the law protects people from those risks, (3) defendant's conduct was unreasonable in light of the risks, and (4) the conduct actually caused the harm to a person at risk. [read post]
