Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 5561 - 5580 of 39,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
It is true that the UK court was only continuing to dig a furrow already largely opened by the Court of Justice in Huawei v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:32 am by Poonam Shokar
  The effectiveness of the IRS and ICCP have received little evaluation from the ICC. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Stick to what you do best: Brainwashing the little bastards at corny u. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In Antony & anr v Sivakumar, Richard Spearman QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, delivered an ex tempore judgment in which he ordered the defendant to pay both claimants £15,000 in damages. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 9:38 am by Eric Goldman
Because of this, we see relatively little innovation in the online music space. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:32 pm
  But I'm a little bit dubious about the "no constitutional standing because it's implausibly pled because we read your studies to say something different than you claim" point. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:18 am by Richard Hunt
It is puzzling that federal regulatory agencies like DOT and HUD have so little interest in the science that is important to their regulatory decisions, preferring instead to simply accept comments from anyone with an axe to grind and make a decision that never addresses the underlying reality of the assertions from the various parties. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm by Jason Kelley
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm
  So the fight between the majority and the dissent is indeed engaging.But that's a little bit swamped by the practicalities of the whole thing.It's a fight about a tiny little slap on an airplane. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419. [12] Australian… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 6:50 am by Eric Turkewitz
So sayeth New York’s highest court back in 2011 in Shiamili v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
For what are robberies themselves, but little kingdoms. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
A little over a week ago, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee commented on the idea of the government compelling people to limit the size of their Thanksgiving feasts. [read post]