Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 6,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 4:17 am
Department of Labor Begins Process To Rescind Obama Administration’s “Defective” Persuader Rule Overhaul — via Labor Relations Today OSHA & Safety Pro Football Player Was Limited to Workers’ Comp for Brain Injury Claims, Louisiana District Court Decides — via Law.com OSHA Delays July 1 Electronic Reporting Requirement — via Currents Employers Beware: Indiana Supreme Court… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
The Center brought that to the attention of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in petitions for extraordinary relief filed April 28, 2008.[5] Seeking to invoke the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in its “King’s Bench” authority to supervise its lower courts, Juvenile Law Center brought Judge Ciavarella’s practices to the attention of the Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The Supreme Court has handed down a decision in the Cartier case finding that internet service providers (“ISP’s”) do not have to bear the costs of implementing a blocking injunction pursuant to section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, the statue requires ISP’s to block access to sites which sell goods that infringe upon trade mark rights. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
Groupon * Georgia Supreme Court Blesses Google’s Keyword Ad Sales–Edible IP v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
The Supreme Court has so held as to obscenity and as to unprotected commercial speech. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Those expansions of federal civil rights authority, they naively expected, would prevent the Supreme Court from overturning anti-discrimination measures, as it had in Dred Scott, in which the majority held unconstitutional the provision of the Missouri Compromise that had rendered slavery illegal in portions of the former Louisiana Territory. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
The Supreme Court approved the settlement in an opinion with scant analysis. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
Ever wondered why the modern Supreme Court seems a lot more concerned about preserving corporate secrecy than personal privacy? [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
” This is because of the Supreme Court’s April 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm
According to a recent decision by Judge Keith Ellison of the Southern District of Texas, this is exactly what happens when Fifth Circuit precedent collides with the Supreme Court’s groundbreaking ruling in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
Indeed, the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
The Supreme Court considered this argument in the 1974 case of United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
The federal common law doesn't apply to drugs or devices, except on really unusual facts, but the Supreme Court being the Supreme Court, it's pretty influential in the substantive policy debate, so we put it first.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court has spoken, and Alabama does not include any independent claims for medical monitoring. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am
Supreme Court has never heard a Section 3 case, and all of the lower court precedents are well over 100 years old. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Stripped to its essentials, any federal preemption argument amounts to the proposition that "supreme" federal power requires/encourages me/my client to do what we're doing. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, not them, to overturn a 2001 Supreme Court ruling upholding the limits. [read post]
6 May 2021, 8:39 am
In March, the Texas Supreme Court let its guidelines for enforcing the Eviction Moratorium expire. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
SCHOOL BOARD OF ALACHUA COUNTY, Appellee. 1st District.Gear Shift: LOUISIANA APPEALS COURT AFFIRMS $5 MILLION VERDICT IN CHILD-DEATH CASE, Guillot v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
” Still, one of the most illuminating essays was presented by political scientist James Gibson, who presented convincing data that almost all decisions of the Court end up receiving majority support if one adds together those who approved of the outcome and those who say (something like) “the reason we have a Supreme Court is to make final decisions about controverted issues of constitutional meaning, so I support whatever the Supreme… [read post]
