Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 4:47 am
" “The pre-TLRA cases remain instructive because if a use does not meet the old pre-1989 ‘token use’ standard, then it certainly will not rise to the higher level of ‘use’” set forth in the TLRA. 3 MCCARTHY ON TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION § 19:111 (5th ed. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
The filing of such frivolous cases requires that the Board sift through each case filed by petitioners, including pages upon pages of unsupported claims that in turn trigger further motion practice to prevent unnecessary litigation from going forward. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:59 pm
This is the issue that recently the Second Board of Appeal of the EUIPO addressed in Case R200/2017-2.BackgroundThis case primarily concerns a dispute between the trade mark proprietor – Andreas Stihl – a German chainsaw manufacturer and – Giro Travel – a Romanian company that imports and trades chainsaws and other similar power tools into Romania. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 11:09 am
The outcome depends on the particularities of each case. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:54 pm
The case has been running for 6 years. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:54 pm
The case has been running for 6 years. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 9:09 am
In Brunetti’s particular case, his admittedly vulgar mark FUCT was originally refused registration on scandalous grounds. [read post]
25 Apr 2006, 12:59 am
Shock generic use of electrical goods trade markToday the European Court of Justice is hearing arguments in Case C-321/03 Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:22 am
See the case of In re Beds & Bars Limited, 122 USPQ2d 1546 (TTAB 2017) [precedential]. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:03 am
Earlier this year, Mark Ashton, a partner in our Chester County office, wrote about the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision, Focht v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 5:15 am
” (para 34) Absent of this, in this case, the applicant had no protectable interest. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:00 pm
" The two arguments that this local Applicant tried on for size were sure TTAB losers, which is why this case is a candidate for our WYHA label. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
" I think this case deserves a slot in our WYHA collection. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:55 am
Mark your calendars for 2013. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 11:09 am
The Limoncello case (as reported here by IPKAT) T-7/04 Shaker di L. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:43 pm
I am a bit slow off the mark here and I am grateful to Iolis who posted the information and links to this interesting case of Police exceeding their powers on the Consilio Discussion Board. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
Bannerjee: “In my judgment, this case bears no resemblance to the cases that Lord Nicholls had in mind as exceptional. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:59 am
My friends at the MBHB law firm have created a new information resource on the pending false marking patent cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
case. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:06 am
In any case, even if Opposer's mark were weak, weak marks are entitled to protection against registration of a substantially similar mark for identical or related goods.Finally, because of the substantial similarities in sound, appearance, and connotation, the two marks are substantially similar in overall commercial impression.Opposer Volkswagen argued that its mark is famous, but the Board agreed with Applicant on this one: there was no… [read post]
