Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 5561 - 5580 of 18,776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:09 am by ACLU
States like Maine will be a haven for abortion access if Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Common Cause, the challenge to North Carolina’s federal congressional map, and Lamone v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am by Jeff Kosseff
Until a few years ago, few people outside of tech policy circles knew much about those 26 words, which are better known as the key part of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:55 pm by Ilya Somin
  But it is no small thing for unelected, life-tenured judges to declare duly enacted legislation passed by the elected representatives of the American people unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
I had just published “Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime” (2004), and Dedi persuaded me to take on the challenge of serving as editor of this series. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times the court announced that “it would not hear a closely watched case on whether cities can make it a crime for homeless people to sleep outdoors,” City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
.: The House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on National Security will hold a hearing on U.S. counterterrorism priorities and challenges in Africa. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:50 am by Amy Howe
The justices also denied review in Smyth v. [read post]