Search for: "People v J."
Results 5561 - 5580
of 7,271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 3:07 am
Ct.1970), (Younger, J.). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:26 pm
District Judge Arthur J. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm
Mattel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
District Judge George Caram Steeh's ruling that the government legally can require uninsured people to purchase coverage.The judge had denied the group's request for an injunction against a provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm
The states did not argue that the revisions to the Medicaid grant program violate the 4-factor test in S.D. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm
The oil company argued that the Supreme Court has implied a nonstatutory exception to the privilege in its decisions in People ex rel Clancy v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
So… hey, banker-people-that-read-me… I know you’re there… Google analytics, remember… are you starting to notice anything changing for you guys of late? [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
In Goldstone v Goldstone & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 39 Lord Justice Thorpe quoted Hedley J in the court below, who had "summarised the litigation in vivid language" thus (at paragraph 42): "1. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:31 am
The evils of health care fraud are many – it undermines the judgment of health care professionals, deprives people of the treatment that they need, and, in many cases, can put patients’ health and safety at risk. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
The reason for this request was that, as Eady J himself noted, “it might be thought that my conclusions do not reflect very well on those people”. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:03 pm
[v]. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd,… [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 3:51 pm
Cebryk v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
Most people have seen those two books as rather different -- the first interested more in economic issues and common law; the second more jurisprudence and constitutional law. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
" People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:34 am
Compare Bowers v. [read post]
