Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 5561 - 5580 of 5,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2007, 2:22 am
First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES S5457 THOMPSON -- Relates to the penalty for violating certain provisions requiring a stop at a railroad crossing Same as A 6300 BLURB : V & T L. penalty rr crossing First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION S5458 THOMPSON -- Makes causing physical injury to a… [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:46 am
As my earlier post regarding the Freeport-McMoRan strike and the recent ATCA case, Sarei v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
"The payment of the fine has been put on a $45 a month schedule, not a smallexpense for this family of working people. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
More for its style rather than its substance (though I think the latter is fine as well).But, as to the former, I like it how Justice Huffman slams -- fairly forcefully -- the various arguments of "the People" (e.g., the deputy AG's) on appeal in a manner that makes it clear that he expects more from the AG's office than existed here and yet avoids being offensive. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:08 am
To summarize, if the US win both cases, people in China might no longer be able to buy a pirated copy of the "Red Dragon" off the street corner 10 days after its release, but they will instead be able to go into the cinema to watch "Red Corner" 10 years after it was released. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
" A recent case from the Tax Court, Goode-Parker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
" Congress also has the power to investigate the workings of the Executive branch simply to determine whether legislative amendments are necessary in order prevent or deter undesirable government practices, and perhaps even for the basic function of facilitating "the American people's ability to reconstruct and come to terms with their history," Nixon v. [read post]