Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 5561 - 5580 of 44,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2022, 2:54 pm by Ilya Somin
While there is an extensive literature arguing for paternalistic interferencewith people's consumption choices, little has been said on behalf of paternalistic interference with people's voting choices. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
” Instead, “FOSTA’s provisions at most implicate speech by imposing restrictions on internet services, which, among other things, may provide a forum or serve as a medium for speech. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am by Tess Bridgeman
” In addressing the American people, he explained that IS posed a threat to “American citizens, personnel and facilities” in Iraq, Syria, and “the broader Middle East,” but also admitted that no plotting had been detected against U.S. territory. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13]  As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If companies are required to police the use or users of their products and services—what scholars have called "third-party policing"[8]—then people's relationship with them may become more and more like people's relationship with the police. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
From January 2008 to March 2013, the fraudster ran Ponzi scheme, thereby stealing more than $100 million from various people and entities. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ferguson, and Shiras may have provided the critical vote to invalidate the federal income tax in Pollock v. [read post]