Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE" Results 5561 - 5580 of 7,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 3:53 am by Russ Bensing
  First this:  On Tuesday, in State v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm by Erin Miller
The first is Stevens’ dissent in Scott v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Erin Miller
During the term when I clerked for Stevens, Rutan v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:52 am by John Bursch
  For example, I was never even asked about Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am by Adam Chandler
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
I have been absolutely swamped at work so it's been a little difficult to find time to analyze the Salazar v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Matt Sundquist
Raich (21:07), in which the Court affirmed that the “Supremacy Clause unambiguously provides that if there is any conflict between federal and state law, federal law shall prevail”; and McIntyre v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm by Erin Miller
” Justice Stevens’ dissent in Texas v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am by Anna Christensen
Supreme Court’s holding nearly two hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
In what might be one of his last dissents, Justice Stevens pointed out that Supreme Court decisions going back to Chief Justice Story’s 1824 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Justice Stevens joined the Court soon after Furman v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:21 am by Erin Miller
The Court issued no grants this morning, though it invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in the felon disenfranchisement case Simmons v. [read post]