Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 5561 - 5580 of 10,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm by Jodie Liu
Second, the section would eliminate the Attorney General and FBI’s ability to issue a certification—which is treated as conclusive by a judge considering a petition to modify or set aside a nondisclosure order—that disclosure may endanger the national security of the United States or interfere with diplomatic relations. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Many judges have relied upon that precedent in ruling against state bans on same-sex marriage, and the Supreme Court  commented favorably on that ruling a year ago in June when it struck down a federal law denying marital benefits to same-sex couples who were already legally married (United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:55 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Clapis, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida explained NIED in the context of car accidents. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:55 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Clapis, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida explained NIED in the context of car accidents. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 12:00 am by Liz Overton
 On July 1, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Young v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by Bill Otis
 One of the most memorable examples was his asking, in the lead dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]