Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 9,597
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
The defense appealed, arguing that the award was excessive; however, in Pinto v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:34 am
Artunduaga v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:42 am
Vincent v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:20 pm
(See Noble v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:37 am
Upon her return to work, she informed her employer that her doctor had recommended physical therapy. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:32 am
In July 2010, he submitted letter from his doctor stating that his diabetes and related conditions required that he not expose himself to extreme heat. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
Mobile health care technology, in particular, has gained the attention of doctors, patients and private equity investors alike. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
V. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm
Doctor’s Associates, Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm
In another case, an employee became depressed and anxious after his mother died; his doctor prescribed Klonopin (Schummer v Black Bear Distribution, LLC). [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:45 am
On June 17, the employee gave the owner a note from his doctor that read: “Due to cardiomyopathy he should avoid heat of the day due to risk of dehydration. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 3:47 am
Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
The Kat apologises for the Handbook's price which, at £126, would have paid for five month's rent on the apartment in Canterbury in which, in 1973, he began working on his doctorate -- but in reality it's good value for money. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Due to shipping considerations, only United States addresses, please. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
., Inc. and Sentry Insurance v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
