Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 29,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:20 pm
Falwell and Snyder v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
Los Angeles v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 11:38 am
Ford v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court recently heard its first big Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) case, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 5:57 am
New York, the challenge to the president’s plan to change the way that House seats are apportioned among the states by excluding people living in the country illegally from the census data used in the apportionment formula. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:24 pm
Chief Justice Rehnquist accurately characterized this dilemma in his handdown of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:09 am
Patzwald v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am
The government has now published the Final Response to its Consultation on the April 2019 Online Harms White Paper. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:18 am
A marriage contract is made between two parties who planning to get married or who are already married. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:03 am
See also Branzburg v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:51 am
In Mensh v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:12 am
This limitation would exclude, among others, the State’s large group health insurers. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
And consider the great length and complexity of the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning and decision in, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
On 26 June 2018, the Secretary of State designated the ANPS under section 5(1) of the Planning Act 2008 (the “PA 2008”). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The plan worked. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
That is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
